In a dramatic showdown during the 2025 Miami Open, Amanda Anisimova’s victory over Mirra Andreeva was marred by controversy. The tension escalated when Anisimova paused the third set to seek medical attention, an act that Andreeva considered a strategic maneuver rather than a genuine requirement.
The match was a significant one, marking the end of Andreeva’s impressive 13-match winning streak. The young tennis star had been on a roll, achieving back-to-back victories, only to be halted by Anisimova in the round of 32 in Miami. This defeat came as a shock, not only ending Andreeva’s victorious run but also sparking a contentious debate over the ethics of the game.
Andreeva’s displeasure was evident as she watched Anisimova call for the physiotherapist during the deciding set of their match. The timing of this break in play was viewed by Andreeva as a tactical move designed to disrupt her rhythm and gain an unfair advantage.
In the high-stakes world of professional tennis, gamesmanship is often criticized yet just as frequently employed. The use of medical timeouts is permitted under the rules, but the timing and intent behind such calls can often be questioned, as was the case in this heated Miami Open encounter.
Despite the controversy, the match concluded with Anisimova triumphant, leaving Andreeva not only with a loss to her record but also with a sense of injustice. It remains to be seen how this incident will affect their professional relationship and future confrontations on the court.
In the dynamic world of tennis, where every point counts, the emphasis on fair play and sportsmanship is paramount. This incident has thrown the spotlight on the grey areas of the rules and rekindled discussions about the use and potential abuse of medical timeouts in tennis. It’s a reminder that the path to victory is not always a straight line but can often be a subject of intense scrutiny and debate.