The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has reaffirmed its stance on Jannik Sinner’s doping case, arguing against the “no fault or negligence” ruling made by the International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA). The Italian World No. 1 was initially cleared of wrongdoing after testing positive for Clostebol in March 2024, but WADA has formally appealed the decision, demanding a one- to two-year ban.
How Did Sinner Test Positive?
An investigation revealed that Sinner’s contamination came from his physiotherapist, who used a Clostebol-containing cream to treat hand wounds. His reported contamination level was one-millionth of a gram per liter, an extremely low dose that the ITIA deemed as accidental. However, WADA is unconvinced by the findings and has decided to take the case to a closed-door hearing on April 16-17.
WADA’s Justification for the Appeal
WADA spokesperson James Fitzgerald, speaking to La Stampa, explained why they believe the original ruling was incorrect:
“We believe that the conclusion of no fault or negligence is incorrect under the current rules, and we are requesting a suspension period of between one and two years.”
While WADA will not seek to annul Sinner’s previous results beyond those already affected, they insist that strict liability applies, meaning Sinner is responsible for any banned substance in his system, regardless of how it got there.
Will WADA Change Its Approach to Contamination Cases?
Sinner’s case raises broader concerns about trace amounts of banned substances found in athletes’ systems. WADA is now reviewing its policies on contamination, acknowledging that low-dose positives could be misinterpreted as doping or masking attempts.
“The issue of possible contamination is real, and WADA is addressing it,” Fitzgerald stated.
“Over the years, the minimum reporting thresholds for various substances have been adjusted to ensure fairness for athletes who unintentionally ingest a banned substance, as well as protection against those who seek to cheat.”
Despite this, WADA remains firm that leniency cannot be granted too easily:
“It is well known that some substances can be taken to conceal the ingestion of others. Therefore, it is crucial that such masking agents remain on the list of prohibited substances and methods.”
What’s Next for Sinner?
The April hearing will be crucial for Sinner’s career. If WADA’s appeal is upheld, the 26-year-old could face a suspension of up to two years, putting his reign as World No. 1 and his future Grand Slam aspirations in jeopardy. If the ITIA ruling stands, Sinner will be fully cleared and continue his historic run.
For now, the tennis world waits, as one of the sport’s biggest stars fights to clear his name.
